CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

decrypt4pdf

对加密的 PDF 文件进行解密。当用户提到 PDF 解密、解除 PDF 密码、解 PDF 时使用。

65

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/pdf/decrypt4pdf/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and actionable for a simple single-purpose skill, with clean sections and executable code. The main improvements would be de-duplicating the repeated example and adding a brief verification step for the decrypted output.

Suggestions

Remove the redundant "使用示例" block or make it meaningfully different from "调用方式" (e.g., show handling of a wrong-password error) to avoid token waste.

Add a one-line verification step after decryption, such as opening output_file to confirm it no longer requires a password, which would raise workflow clarity.

Reconcile the parameter table with the example: either show input_path/output_path usage or clarify why input_file/output_file are marked optional despite being required for output.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with no concept padding, but contains minor redundancy: "功能描述" restates the description and the "使用示例" near-duplicates the "调用方式" code block, so it is efficient with trim opportunities rather than fully lean.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides executable, copy-paste Python code and a parameter table with types/required flags, but the example omits the input_path/output_path params listed in the table and marks clearly-needed inputs as optional, leaving minor gaps versus fully executable coverage.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The single decrypt action is unambiguous and shown with concrete code, but there is no verification that the output was actually decrypted (e.g., confirming the result opens without a password), so it stops just short of a fully validated workflow.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

At under 50 lines with no external references needed, the content is split into well-organized, clearly headed sections (功能描述, 调用方式, 参数说明, 返回值, 使用示例), satisfying the simple-skill exception for full marks on progressive disclosure.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and effectively pairs a concrete capability statement with explicit user-trigger phrases in third person. It is strong on completeness and trigger coverage, with only minor room to add the .pdf extension and broaden action enumeration.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (encrypted PDFs) and one concrete action ("对加密的 PDF 文件进行解密" / decrypt), matching the anchor that lists 1-2 concrete actions without being comprehensive; not a 4 since only a single action is given with no further enumeration.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states the what ("对加密的 PDF 文件进行解密") and an explicit when with concrete triggers ("当用户提到 PDF 解密、解除 PDF 密码、解 PDF 时使用"), matching the anchor requiring both with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrases "PDF 解密、解除 PDF 密码、解 PDF" covering synonyms and variations, but omits the file extension (.pdf), so it falls short of the comprehensive anchor 5 and sits at good-coverage anchor 4.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Decrypting encrypted PDFs is a clear niche with distinct password/decryption triggers, but there is minor overlap risk with adjacent PDF skills, so it is mostly distinct rather than fully conflict-free.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
CoderWanFeng/python-office
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.