Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a compact, mostly executable function wrapper with good organization and clear parameters. Its main gaps are minor description redundancy and the absence of any output-validation step for this document-conversion task.
Suggestions
Remove the redundant restatement in the blockquote and 功能描述 section since the conversion is already stated in the frontmatter description.
Add a brief verification step after the call (e.g., confirm the .doc file was created and is openable) to lift workflow_clarity above the document-manipulation cap.
Show one more usage variant (such as specifying output_name) so the examples fully cover the documented parameters.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with an executable call, a parameter table, and a usage example, but the conversion is restated redundantly (blockquote, 功能描述, and frontmatter all repeat it), so a few tokens could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable Python showing the function signature and a usage example with a parameter table, covering the common case; just short of fully copy-paste ready across variants since only one output scenario is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single-step workflow (call docx2doc) is unambiguous, but this is document manipulation with no verification step (e.g., confirming the .doc is valid/openable), so per the feedback-loop guidance it is capped at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (~40-line), single-purpose skill with no need for external references, organized into clearly labeled sections, matching the under-50-lines exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |