Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clean, actionable reference for a simple single-function skill, with copy-paste examples and a well-organized parameter table. It loses points for administrative meta-sections and the absence of validation for batch/folder conversions.
Suggestions
Drop the "所属分类" path and "原始函数" meta-sections; the import path in the code block already conveys the same information and they add tokens without aiding execution.
Add a brief verification step for batch/folder conversions (e.g., confirm the expected number of output images were written) so the workflow has a validation checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean (code signature, compact params table, two examples), but "所属分类" and "原始函数" sections are administrative meta-padding that do not aid execution. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready Python call with a complete params table (types, defaults, semantics) and two concrete usage examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action is unambiguous, but input_path can be a folder path (batch operation) with no validation/verification checkpoint, capping clarity at 2 per the rubric. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, no external references needed, organized into clear labeled sections — meets the simple-skill bar for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |