Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-structured single-purpose skill with executable code and a complete parameter table. Its main weakness is mild redundancy between the two code-example sections and a few non-actionable metadata lines that keep conciseness at the middle level.
Suggestions
Merge the '调用方式' and '使用示例' code blocks into a single representative example to remove the near-duplicate call.
Drop or relocate the non-actionable metadata sections ('所属分类', '原始函数') unless they are needed for routing, to tighten token efficiency.
Consider noting the page-range convention (0-indexed vs 1-indexed) inline with the example to prevent off-by-one misuse.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and never over-explains concepts Claude already knows, but the '调用方式' and '使用示例' sections duplicate near-identical code and the metadata sections (所属分类, 原始函数) add little actionable value, so it falls short of 'every token earns its place'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable Python code plus a parameter table with types, required flags, and defaults, making the guidance copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-task skill where the one action (call split4pdf with input, output, and page range) is unambiguous, satisfying the simple-skills allowance; it is a non-destructive read-and-write so no validation checkpoint is required. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and is organized into clearly labeled sections (功能描述, 调用方式, 参数说明, 返回值, 使用示例), meeting the simple-skills bar for progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |