Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, lean, and mostly actionable with concrete tool calls and a clear workflow. The main gap is a missing error-recovery feedback loop for the batch execute operation.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop after RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL (e.g., on error, inspect the returned error, adjust arguments per the search schema, and re-execute) to support the batch operation.
De-duplicate the RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS example that appears in both 'Tool Discovery' and 'Step 1' to tighten conciseness.
Clarify how to obtain/seed the initial session id and when to reuse vs. regenerate it within a single workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence with no concept padding, though the RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS example is shown twice and prerequisites reiterate the search-first rule. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete code blocks with real tool slugs and parameter shapes are provided; remaining placeholders (TOOL_SLUG_FROM_SEARCH, session IDs) are justified by runtime schema discovery rather than vagueness. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The discover->connect->execute sequence has connection validation checkpoints, but RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL is a batch operation with no validate->fix->retry feedback loop, which caps workflow clarity at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so the skill is self-contained with clean section headers and a Quick Reference table; slightly above the simple-skill line count with minor inline duplication keeps it just under 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |