Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and actionable with clean tool-call examples, but batch execution lacks explicit validation checkpoints and a few placeholders reduce copy-paste readiness. Tightening repetition and adding a verify step would improve it.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL (e.g. inspect the response for errors/pagination before continuing) to support batch operations.
Replace the placeholder 'TOOL_SLUG_FROM_SEARCH' with at least one concrete worked example showing a real slug and arguments from a search result.
Deduplicate the 'always search first' and 'check connection' guidance that appears in both Prerequisites/Setup and Known Pitfalls.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with tight code blocks and a compact quick-reference table; minor repetition between the Setup and Known Pitfalls sections could be trimmed, fitting the 'efficient, minor over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete RUBE tool-call blocks with parameter shapes, but the execute step relies on a placeholder slug ('TOOL_SLUG_FROM_SEARCH') rather than a copy-paste-ready example, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The core workflow is clearly sequenced (discover, check connection, execute), but the batch-capable RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL step has no validation checkpoint confirming the response before proceeding, which the guidelines cap at 3 for batch operations. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-file skill with no bundle references and clear section headers; the simple-skill exception applies and the content is well organized. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |