CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

alpha-vantage-automation

Automate Alpha Vantage tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

76

3.57x
Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

93%

3.57x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./composio-skills/alpha-vantage-automation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and actionable with a clear, validated workflow and no padded explanations. Its main weakness is minor redundancy of the 'search first' guidance and lighter error-recovery framing.

Suggestions

Consolidate the 'always search first' guidance into one location (e.g., Known Pitfalls) and cross-reference from the Prerequisites section to remove repetition.

Add an explicit feedback loop for pagination and auth failures (e.g., 'If pagination_token present, repeat RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL with the token until empty').

Show one fully-resolved example call with a real tool slug and concrete arguments to lift actionability from 4 to 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, avoiding concept over-explanation; the only drag is the 'always search first' guidance repeated across Prerequisites, Tool Discovery, Step 1, and Known Pitfalls, fitting anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete tool names and argument shapes (RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS queries/session, RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL tools/memory) are provided and are executable; placeholders are justified by the dynamic-schema discovery model, matching anchor 4 with minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Discover -> Check connection -> Execute sequence is clearly ordered with validation checkpoints (confirm ACTIVE before running, verify schema compliance), fitting anchor 4; a 5 is withheld because error-recovery feedback loops (e.g., retry on pagination/auth failure) are mentioned but not framed as explicit loops.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single well-organized file with clear section headers and no nested/buried references (no bundle files present), and its only external pointer is a one-level-deep toolkit docs link, matching anchor 5 for a self-contained skill.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly identifies the skill's domain and mechanism but lacks a 'Use when...' trigger clause and concrete capability list, capping it at the midpoint. It is distinctive but somewhat generic in its action verbs.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause naming natural user phrases (e.g., 'Use when the user asks for Alpha Vantage stock data, forex rates, or time-series analysis').

Replace the generic 'tasks' with 2-3 concrete capabilities (e.g., 'fetch stock quotes, forex rates, and economic indicators').

Include common synonyms and file/term variations (stock data, market data, .csv exports) to improve trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('Alpha Vantage') and a concrete action ('Automate ... tasks via Rube MCP') but 'tasks' is generic and no list of specific capabilities is given, matching anchor 3 rather than 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

A clear 'what' is stated (automate Alpha Vantage tasks via Rube MCP) but there is no 'Use when...' trigger clause, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Keywords like 'Alpha Vantage', 'Rube MCP', and 'Composio' are present but lean technical; common natural synonyms (stock data, forex, time series, market quotes) are missing, fitting anchor 3.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Alpha Vantage automation via Rube MCP is a distinct niche unlikely to conflict with other skills, matching anchor 4 ('mostly distinct; minor overlap risk') rather than 5 because the description is thin on concrete trigger phrases.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.