Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured with concrete tool-call shapes, but relies on placeholders for arguments and omits validation/retry feedback loops for batch tool execution. Solid upper-mid quality.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate-and-retry feedback loop after RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL (check results, handle errors/partial failures, retry) given the batch nature of the skill.
Replace placeholder arguments with at least one fully worked example call using real discovered tool slugs and concrete arguments.
Consolidate the repeated 'always search first' guidance into one location to trim redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, well-sectioned body with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows; only minor repetition of the 'always search first' message across sections keeps it from a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete MCP tool-call templates with parameters, but arguments are placeholders ('TOOL_SLUG_FROM_SEARCH', '/* schema-compliant args */') rather than executable code, leaving key details to a live search. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Setup and Core Workflow sequences with a connection check exist, but multi-tool/batch execution (RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL, pagination) lacks an explicit validate-result/retry feedback loop, which caps this dimension at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files; body is cleanly sectioned with a Quick Reference table and a single-level external docs link, with only minor organization gaps versus an ideal split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |