Automate Apaleo tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
67
53%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./composio-skills/apaleo-automation/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
22%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is too vague to effectively guide skill selection. It names the integration target (Apaleo via Rube MCP/Composio) but fails to specify what tasks can be automated or when Claude should select this skill. The operational instruction about searching tools doesn't help with skill selection.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions that can be performed (e.g., 'Create reservations, manage room inventory, process check-ins/check-outs, retrieve guest information').
Add a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms users would say (e.g., 'Use when the user mentions Apaleo, hotel reservations, property management, or hospitality operations').
Remove or relocate the operational instruction ('Always search tools first') to the skill body, as it doesn't help with skill selection.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description uses vague language like 'Automate Apaleo tasks' without specifying what tasks can be automated. No concrete actions are listed - just abstract 'tasks' and a generic instruction to 'search tools first.' | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The 'what' is extremely vague ('Automate Apaleo tasks') and there is no 'when' clause or explicit trigger guidance. The instruction about searching tools is operational guidance, not a usage trigger. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes domain-specific terms 'Apaleo', 'Rube MCP', and 'Composio' which are relevant keywords, but lacks natural user language variations. Users might say 'hotel booking', 'reservation', 'property management' but none of these are present. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The specific mention of 'Apaleo' and 'Rube MCP (Composio)' provides some distinctiveness for this particular integration, but 'Automate tasks' is generic enough to potentially conflict with other automation skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill that efficiently communicates how to automate Apaleo tasks via Rube MCP. The workflow is clear with proper validation steps, and the content respects token budget. The main weakness is that the tool call examples use a pseudocode-like format rather than showing actual MCP tool invocation syntax that would be directly executable.
Suggestions
Convert the tool call examples to actual executable MCP tool invocation format rather than the current pseudocode-style representation
Add a concrete example showing a complete end-to-end workflow (e.g., 'Create a reservation') with actual response handling
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, avoiding explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a purpose with no padding or unnecessary context about what Apaleo or Composio are. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool call patterns with specific parameter structures, but uses pseudocode-style examples rather than fully executable code. The examples show structure but aren't copy-paste ready since they use placeholder syntax. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 3-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoint (Step 2: Check Connection shows ACTIVE before proceeding). The Known Pitfalls section provides error prevention guidance and the sequence is unambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections progressing from prerequisites to setup to workflow to pitfalls. External reference to Composio docs is one level deep and clearly signaled. Quick reference table aids navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
2790447
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.