Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, actionable guide with a clearly sequenced workflow and validation checkpoints, held back only by repeated search-first guidance, placeholder arguments, and the absence of full error-recovery feedback loops.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'always search first' guidance into one authoritative callout to remove cross-section repetition.
Add one fully worked example using a concrete Basin tool slug and real arguments to lift actionability toward copy-paste readiness.
Add an explicit error-recovery loop for execution failures (e.g., on non-ACTIVE connection or schema mismatch, re-search and retry) to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with concrete tool-call blocks and no padding about concepts Claude already knows, though the "always search first" directive is restated across Prerequisites, Tool Discovery, Known Pitfalls, and Quick Reference. This fits the score-4 anchor (efficient, minor trims possible) rather than 5 (every token earns its place) due to that repetition. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete MCP tool invocations with parameter shapes are provided (RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS, RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONS, RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL), but the arguments use placeholders ("TOOL_SLUG_FROM_SEARCH", "your specific Basin task") rather than a worked example with a real Basin tool slug and arguments. This matches score 4 (mostly executable, minor gaps) rather than 5 (copy-paste ready covering common cases). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Setup and the Core Workflow Pattern are clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints (confirm ACTIVE status before executing, schema compliance, pagination handling), and one feedback loop exists (follow auth link if not ACTIVE). It is not capped at 3 because validation is present for the batch/execute operations, but it stops short of score 5's explicit error-recovery feedback loops and checklists for the broader workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections with a one-level external reference (composio.dev/toolkits/basin) and a Quick Reference table, and no nested/buried references exist. It fits score 4 (good structure, minor organization gaps) rather than 5 because some inline material (Known Pitfalls, Quick Reference) could be split out as the skill grows. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |