Automate Beeminder tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
70
58%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./composio-skills/beeminder-automation/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description identifies the target service (Beeminder) and tooling (Rube MCP/Composio) but fails to specify concrete actions or provide explicit trigger guidance. The instruction to 'search tools first' is implementation detail rather than selection criteria. Without a 'Use when...' clause and specific capability listing, Claude may struggle to correctly select this skill.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms like 'Beeminder', 'goal tracking', 'commitment contracts', 'log data points', or 'check deadlines'
List specific concrete actions such as 'create goals, log data points, check goal status, update commitments'
Remove implementation details ('Always search tools first') and focus on user-facing capabilities and selection triggers
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Beeminder) and mentions automation via a specific tool (Rube MCP/Composio), but doesn't list concrete actions like 'create goals', 'log data points', or 'check deadlines'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Provides a weak 'what' (automate tasks) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes 'Beeminder' which is a natural keyword, but lacks common user terms like 'goals', 'tracking', 'commitment device', 'data points', or 'deadlines' that users would naturally say. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | 'Beeminder' is distinctive, but 'automate tasks' is generic and could overlap with other automation skills. The mention of Rube MCP/Composio adds some specificity but could conflict with other Composio-based skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill that efficiently teaches Beeminder automation through Rube MCP. Its strengths are clear workflow sequencing, good organization, and appropriate brevity. The main weakness is that tool call examples are structural templates rather than fully executable code, though this is somewhat justified by the dynamic nature of tool discovery.
Suggestions
Consider adding one complete end-to-end example showing actual tool slugs and arguments returned from a real RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS call, even if noted as 'example output that may change'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, avoiding unnecessary explanations of what Beeminder or MCP are. Every section serves a purpose and assumes Claude's competence with APIs and tool execution patterns. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool call patterns with parameter structures, but uses pseudo-code style rather than fully executable examples. The tool calls show structure but aren't copy-paste ready since they depend on dynamic discovery results. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 3-step workflow pattern (discover → check connection → execute) with explicit validation checkpoint for connection status. The 'Known Pitfalls' section provides error prevention guidance and the setup section includes verification steps. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections progressing from prerequisites to setup to workflow to pitfalls. External reference to Composio docs is one level deep. Quick reference table provides scannable summary. Appropriate length for a single SKILL.md file. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
2790447
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.