Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An efficient, well-structured overview that routes Claude to the right one-level-deep reference with clear scope annotations. It is concise and well-disclosed; the only weak spot is that all executable detail lives in the reference files rather than inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Seven lean lines with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. It is not 4 because there are no instances of over-explanation to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, specific routing guidance mapping each real reference file to its exact scope (e.g. 'references/implementation.md for Effect command wiring and service patterns'). It is not 5 because the body delegates all executable detail to the reference files rather than including any inline concrete steps, and not 3 because the file-to-scope mapping is precise and actionable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action (read the matching reference, then act) is unambiguous and each bullet specifies when it applies. It is not 5 because the body does not spell out an explicit decision procedure or sequencing beyond 'Read the relevant reference', and not 3 because the routing logic is clear and this is not a destructive/batch operation requiring validation checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview pointing to three well-signaled, one-level-deep references (design.md, implementation.md, client-cache-sync.md — all verified to exist), each annotated with its scope and content appropriately split out of SKILL.md. It is not 4 because navigation is clean with no organization gaps or buried references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |