CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

kb-retriever

面向本地知识库目录的检索和问答助手。核心流程:(1)分层索引导航 (2)遇到PDF/Excel时必须先读取references学习处理方法 (3)处理文件后再检索。按文件类型组合使用 grep、Read、pdfplumber、pandas 进行渐进式检索,避免整文件加载。用户问题涉及"从知识库目录回答问题/检索信息/查资料"时使用。

65

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/kb-retriever/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A clearly sequenced, well-organized skill body with strong workflow checkpoints and proper one-level-deep reference structure. Its weaknesses are repetition of the PDF/Excel 'read references first' guidance across multiple sections and slightly deferred/incomplete inline code examples that lean on the referenced files.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated 'must read pdf_reading.md / excel_reading.md before processing' guidance into one authoritative section and cross-reference it, rather than restating it in the checklist, 总体流程, per-type strategies, and 与其他工具的协同 sections.

Add a few complete inline executable snippets in SKILL.md (e.g. a minimal pdfplumber table-extraction block and a pandas nrows+filter block) so the core actions are copy-paste ready without always deferring to references.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and well-structured, but repeats the same PDF/Excel 'must read references' instructions across the checklist, the 总体流程, per-type strategies, and the 与其他工具的协同 section, adding redundant tokens Claude already grasps after the first statement.

2 / 3

Actionability

Gives some concrete guidance (e.g. `pdftotext input.pdf output.txt`, `df[df['column'] == value]`, `pattern="**/data_structure.md"`, `test -d knowledge`) but leaves key steps as instructions to defer to references rather than inline executable examples, and lacks complete copy-paste blocks in SKILL.md itself.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequenced flow (理解需求 → 分层索引 → 学习方法 → 处理检索 → 迭代 → 答案溯源) with an explicit checklist with checkmarks, a max-5 iteration counter, and error/uncertainty handling checkpoints — explicit validation/feedback loops are present.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is an overview that consistently and clearly signals one-level-deep references (references/pdf_reading.md, excel_reading.md, excel_analysis.md) plus a script (scripts/convert_pdf_to_images.py); all referenced paths are real bundle files, content is appropriately split, and navigation is easy.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-scoped description that clearly states capabilities and an explicit use-trigger, with concrete tooling and a distinctive local knowledge-base niche. Trigger term coverage is the weakest point: only one phrasing is given and natural user variations are thin.

Suggestions

Broaden trigger terms to natural variations users would actually say, e.g. '查找/搜索知识库', '搜文档', '从文档里找', and English forms like 'search the knowledge base/docs'.

Consider trimming the parenthetical numbered core-flow detail slightly; the essence (index → learn-then-process → progressive retrieval) reads cleanly without overloading the description.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions: hierarchical index navigation, reading references before processing, file-type-specific retrieval combining grep/Read/pdfplumber/pandas, and progressive retrieval to avoid whole-file loading.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (the core flow: index navigation, learn-then-process, progressive retrieval) and 'when' ('用户问题涉及从知识库目录回答问题/检索信息/查资料时使用').

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes a natural trigger phrasing ('从知识库目录回答问题/检索信息/查资料') but is fairly narrow; it lacks common variation terms users might say such as '查找', '搜文档', or English equivalents like 'search docs/knowledge base'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped tightly to a local knowledge-base directory with a defined multi-type file workflow; the explicit directory-root and learn-before-process framing distinguishes it from generic file or PDF/Excel skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
ConardLi/garden-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.