Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable guide that assumes Claude's competence and leverages real bundle files. It scores consistently high across dimensions with only minor tightening and checkpoint improvements possible.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate-and-retry loop for the eval-run step (run evals -> inspect failures -> revise) to strengthen workflow_clarity checkpoints.
Tighten prose like 'Keep the body focused on workflow, decisions, and output expectations' into a direct directive to nudge conciseness toward 5.
Link the body's references to the specific bundle files (e.g., scripts/run_eval.py, references/schemas.md) by name so progressive disclosure navigation is fully explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and imperative with a concrete template, but includes a few explanatory sentences ('Keep the body focused on workflow...') that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete copy-paste YAML template and a JSON sync snippet with real paths; minor gaps in full executable coverage of the test/eval workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear create -> draft -> test -> improve sequence with a completion checklist acting as validation; minor checkpoint gaps in the eval-run step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections that point to real scripts/ and references/ bundles (schemas.md confirmed present); mostly clear one-level-deep navigation with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |