Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally lean and executable workflow: concrete commands, explicit approval gates, and a validation feedback loop, with detail correctly delegated to referenced project files. The only defect found is the duplicated "1. 1." step marker in Stage 4, and Stage 6 lacks a light verification of the exported files before announcing readiness.
Suggestions
Fix the duplicated list marker in Stage 4 ("1. 1. Write `draft.md`...") so each step is numbered exactly once.
Add a light validation step in Stage 6 before telling Daisy the files are ready — e.g., confirm devto.md front matter is well-formed (title, published: false, description, exactly 4 tags) and that preview.html renders.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is entirely imperative, staged instructions with zero concept explanations or padding — every line from the brief-field checks to the dev.to front-matter block is operational. It assumes Claude's competence and every token earns its place, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact commands with arguments ("python scripts/check_draft.py output/<slug>/draft.md", "python scripts/make_preview.py output/<slug>"), a named conda environment, a defined success condition ("until it prints `All checks passed`"), an exact "<!-- VERIFY: reason -->" convention, and a copy-paste dev.to front-matter template. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six ordered stages with "Never skip a stage", two explicit approval checkpoints, do-not-proceed guards, and a fix-and-rerun feedback loop — this exceeds the anchor-4 profile (which permits validation gaps). It falls short of a clean 5 only because Stage 4 step 1 contains a malformed duplicated step marker ("1. 1. Write `draft.md`..."), a visible defect in the written sequence. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the ~54-line body is well-organized into stage sections that appropriately delegate detail one level deep via clearly signaled paths (briefs/_template.yaml, voice-samples/, scripts/check_draft.py, CLAUDE.md sections) — matching the anchor for a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |