Content
35%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill delivers a genuinely actionable contradiction-resolution procedure with decision branches and a named tool, but it is weighed down by verbose philosophical framing and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure. Trimming rhetoric and adding a worked example would materially improve it.
Suggestions
Cut the motivational prose and rhetorical questions (e.g. the '如果这些问题让你不舒服了' paragraph) to keep only the diagnostic questions and decision rules.
Add one short worked example showing a parent/child conflict and the resulting delete-vs-rewrite decision to make the procedure copy-paste concrete.
Split the long self-interrogation question lists for 形态一 into a separate reference file and link to it, so SKILL.md stays a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is padded with motivational rhetoric and rhetorical questions (e.g. '坐在不适感里', '如果这些问题让你不舒服了——好，那你现在的状态是对的') that add tokens beyond the instructional core Claude needs. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete 5-step duel process with explicit 子节点败诉/父节点败诉 branches and names the `update_memory` tool, but lacks a worked example and the abstract framing dilutes the concrete guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Form two is a clearly sequenced 5-step procedure with decision gates and a pre-delete check ('删掉旧的，同样的错误会不会复发'), but verification is judgment-based rather than a concrete validate-fix loop and form one is an unstructured reflective checklist. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is a single monolithic document; it has two top-level sections (形态一/形态二) but long question lists and scenarios that could be offloaded remain inline with no references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |