transak
Transak fiat-to-crypto on-ramp for Web3. Buy and sell crypto with 100+ payment methods across 170+ countries.
45
48%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Risky
Do not use without reviewing
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./public/skills/0xterrybit/transak/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description identifies the domain (Transak fiat-to-crypto on-ramp) and provides some useful context about capabilities (100+ payment methods, 170+ countries), but reads more like marketing copy than a skill selection guide. It critically lacks a 'Use when...' clause and misses common user trigger terms, making it difficult for Claude to reliably select this skill at the right time.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about integrating Transak, adding a fiat-to-crypto on-ramp, or enabling crypto purchases in a Web3 application.'
Include more natural trigger terms users would say, such as 'purchase crypto', 'convert fiat to crypto', 'crypto payment widget', 'on-ramp integration', 'Transak SDK', or 'Transak API'.
List specific concrete actions the skill enables, such as 'integrate the Transak widget, configure supported currencies, handle webhook callbacks, customize the checkout flow'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (fiat-to-crypto on-ramp) and some actions (buy and sell crypto), with additional details about payment methods and country coverage, but doesn't list multiple concrete technical actions like integration steps, SDK usage, or API calls. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Describes what the skill is about (Transak fiat-to-crypto on-ramp, buying/selling crypto) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. Per rubric guidelines, missing 'Use when' caps completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also only moderately detailed, warranting a 1. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant keywords like 'fiat-to-crypto', 'on-ramp', 'buy and sell crypto', 'Transak', and 'Web3', but misses common user variations like 'purchase crypto', 'convert fiat', 'crypto payment gateway', 'KYC', or 'widget integration'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The mention of 'Transak' specifically and 'fiat-to-crypto on-ramp' provides some distinctiveness, but 'buy and sell crypto' and 'Web3' are broad enough to potentially overlap with other crypto/Web3 skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides strong actionable API examples with executable curl commands and proper response parsing, making it immediately useful for Transak integration. However, it reads more like an API reference than a workflow guide—it lacks a cohesive integration workflow with validation checkpoints, and includes marketing-style content and static reference data that inflates token usage without adding proportional value.
Suggestions
Add a sequenced integration workflow section (e.g., 1. Get quote → 2. Generate widget → 3. Poll order status → 4. Verify webhook → 5. Fulfill order) with explicit validation at each step.
Move static reference tables (supported networks, payment methods, order statuses, error codes) into a separate REFERENCE.md file and link to it from the main skill.
Remove the marketing-style features list (emoji bullets about 170+ countries, 600+ DeFi projects) as it provides no actionable guidance for Claude.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Generally efficient with tables and code blocks, but includes some unnecessary content like emoji decorations, the features marketing list (170+ countries, 600+ projects), and reference tables (supported networks, payment methods) that could be looked up via the API itself. The supported networks and payment methods tables are static data that will go stale. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash/curl commands with proper variable setup, query parameters, and jq parsing. The webhook verification function, widget URL construction, and API calls are all copy-paste ready with clear parameterization. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Individual API calls are clear, but there's no sequenced workflow tying them together (e.g., get quote → generate widget → poll order status → verify webhook). The safety rules mention verifying webhooks and checking order status but don't integrate these into a step-by-step flow with validation checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably organized with clear section headers, but it's a long monolithic file. The static reference tables (networks, payment methods, error codes, order statuses) could be split into separate reference files, and there are no internal cross-references or navigation aids. Links to external docs are provided but no bundle files structure the content. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata.version' is missing | Warning |
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- Demerzels-lab/elsamultiskillagent
- Commit
f45fcb5
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.