Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured PR workflow with strong safety rules and a validation checkpoint. It could be improved by adding the exact push/PR-create command and an explicit validation-retry loop.
Suggestions
Add the concrete push and draft-PR command in step 7 (e.g., 'git push -u origin HEAD' and 'gh pr create --draft --base main') so the final external action is copy-paste ready.
Add a brief fix-and-retry loop after the validation step (e.g., 'If validation fails, fix the issue and re-run until it passes before proceeding').
Clarify how to detect an existing PR for the branch (e.g., 'gh pr view --json url') to make step 1's 'any existing pull request' check executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line ('git status --short', 'CONTRIBUTING.md', safety rules) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance with specific commands and file paths ('git status --short', '.github/pull_request_template.md', example Conventional Commit title), but omits the literal push/PR-create command (e.g., 'gh pr create') leaving the final external action underspecified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 8-step numbered sequence with a validation checkpoint (step 4) and an authorization gate (step 2), but lacks an explicit fix-and-retry loop after a validation failure. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with well-organized '## Workflow' and '## Safety rules' sections and no need for external references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |