Conciseness

The body is dense with non-obvious operational knowledge (imageHash-only image fills, getLocalVariableCollectionsAsync being local-only, createNodeFromSvg width/height sizing) and contains no beginner-concept padding — matching the level-4 anchor of efficient with minor trimmable instances. Not 5 because key mandates are repeated verbatim in multiple places: the parallel generate_figma_design capture requirement appears in its own section plus Step 1 item 5 plus Step 5, and the font-family assertion appears in Step 1, Step 5, and Best Practices.

Actionability

Every step ships executable JavaScript for the Figma plugin API — component-key resolution from Code Connect URLs, bound-variable enumeration, wrapper sizing by container type with concrete dimensions, setProperties() text overrides, createNodeFromSvg icon import with the viewBox/width/height requirement — plus concrete search-term lists and parsing rules (hyphens to colons). This matches the level-5 anchor: copy-paste-ready code covering the common cases.

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–6 are explicitly ordered ('Follow these steps in order. Do not skip steps.') with hard gates forbidding premature canvas mutation, per-section get_screenshot validation with a defect checklist (cropped text, overlaps, placeholder text, wrong font, blank images), and a STOP→read→inspect→fix→retry error-recovery loop noting script atomicity. This is the level-5 anchor: clear sequence, explicit validation, feedback loops.

Progressive Disclosure

The core workflow lives in SKILL.md with detail delegated to clearly-signaled one-level-deep references — references/componentization.md and references/discover-product-font.md both exist in the bundle, and the Reference Docs section annotates each ../figma-use reference with its content. This matches the level-4 anchor (good structure, most content appropriately placed, minor gaps): the icon-SVG-import section and the image-transfer scripts are substantial inline content that could be split out, and heavy reliance on a sibling skill's references outside this bundle is a small navigation risk.

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions — 'Discovers design system components, variables, and styles from Code Connect files, existing screens, and library search, then imports them and assembles views incrementally section-by-section using design system tokens' — covering the full discover→import→assemble pipeline. This matches the level-5 anchor (multiple specific concrete actions, comprehensive coverage) rather than level 4, whose coverage has minor gaps.

Completeness

Both 'what' (discovers design system components/variables/styles, imports them, assembles views section-by-section with tokens) and 'when' ('This is the preferred workflow skill whenever the user wants to build or update a full page, modal, dialog, drawer, sidebar, panel, or any composed multi-section view in Figma') are explicitly stated with concrete trigger phrases — the level-5 anchor exactly.

Trigger Term Quality

Explicit trigger phrases are natural user phrasings with synonyms: 'write to Figma', 'create in Figma from code', 'push page to Figma', 'take this app/page and build it in Figma', 'create a screen', 'build a landing page in Figma', 'convert this modal/dialog/drawer/panel to Figma'. This is comprehensive natural-term coverage per the level-5 anchor, not merely 'good keyword coverage' (level 4).

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description clearly scopes to composed multi-section views and distinguishes itself from the sibling figma-use skill ('Use this skill alongside figma-use'), matching the level-4 anchor of mostly distinct with minor overlap risk. Not 5 because it shares 'build in Figma' language with figma-use itself, so a component-creation request could plausibly match either; not 3 because the multi-section vs. component boundary is explicitly drawn.