The body is lean and every line earns its place; it does not explain what WeChat or a draft is. Not score 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation or padding to tighten.

Names concrete commands at each step (get-draft, list-drafts, create-draft, update-draft, submit-publish, get-publish-status) and specifies what to surface (title, draft ID, impact). As an instruction-only skill, this concrete guidance is fully actionable; not score 2 because the directives are specific, not pseudocode or vague.

Steps 1–4 are clearly sequenced with an explicit confirmation checkpoint before publish (step 3) and a post-publish status verification (step 4), plus an edge-case rule. Not score 2 because validation/confirmation checkpoints are present and explicit, not merely implied.

A simple skill under 50 lines with no external references needed; content is well-organized as a numbered workflow with a clear edge-case note. Per the simple-skills scoring note, this warrants 3 without bundle files.

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'drafts and publication', 'explicit preview', 'confirmation', 'post-publication status checks' — rather than vague language. Not score 2 because it enumerates several distinct operations, not just a domain and a couple of actions.

Clearly states what the skill does, but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should invoke it. The rubric guideline caps completeness at 2 in this case, so it cannot reach 3 despite a clear 'what'.

Includes natural terms a user would say — 'WeChat Official Account', 'drafts', 'publication' — covering the main phrasings. Not score 2 because the core trigger terms are present rather than only technical jargon.

The WeChat Official Account publishing niche is specific and unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills. Not score 2 because the domain is narrow and distinct rather than broadly overlapping.