Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured, actionable body that gives copy-paste-ready grep and output templates with verification built into the summary. Only minor polish (an example row, removing one redundant line) would push it higher.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining grep or comments; a minor redundancy (restating the `ponytail: <ceiling>, <upgrade path>` convention already implied by the intro) keeps it just short of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides an executable grep command, a concrete output-row template, a flagging rule, and a summary line; the only gap is the absence of a literal filled-in example ledger row. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The scan -> format -> flag -> summarize sequence is clear, and the count summary plus no-trigger flagging serve as verification checkpoints for this batch read-only operation; no explicit error-recovery loop prevents a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and three well-organized sections (Scan, Output, Boundaries), matching the rubric's simple-skill allowance for a top score on structure alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |