CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

orchestrate-batch-refactor

Plan and execute large refactor or rewrite efforts efficiently with parallel multi-agent analysis and implementation. Use when a user asks to refactor many files, split workstreams, analyze a target code area, and coordinate sub-agents with clear ownership and dependency-aware execution.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is an efficient, well-structured overview that delegates bulky templates to real reference files while retaining a clear, validated multi-step workflow with feedback loops. It is strong across all dimensions, with only minor actionability gaps in synthesis specifics.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and well-organized with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Overview, Workflow, Packet Rules, Contracts, Guardrails, Validation) earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete step-by-step workflow plus copy-paste-ready templates referenced via real files give mostly executable guidance, with minor gaps in how to synthesize/merge explorer output into the plan.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 6-step core workflow is paired with an ordered Validation Strategy, explicit Safety Guardrails, and a "stop and re-plan" feedback loop, satisfying the batch-operation validation requirement.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a concise overview that points to two real, one-level-deep reference files (work-packet-template.md, agent-prompt-templates.md) with clearly signaled links, splitting bulk detail appropriately.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys both the capability and explicit trigger conditions in third person, with concrete actions and natural trigger language. It is comprehensive, only slightly short of the top anchors on specificity and trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ("plan and execute large refactor or rewrite efforts", "parallel multi-agent analysis and implementation", "split workstreams", "coordinate sub-agents"), with only minor coverage gaps versus the comprehensive 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states the "what" (plan/execute large refactors with parallel multi-agent analysis) and the "when" ("Use when a user asks to refactor many files, split workstreams, analyze a target code area, and coordinate sub-agents") with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrasing like "refactor many files", "split workstreams", and "coordinate sub-agents" align with what users say, but a few common synonyms are missing, so it sits below the 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The multi-agent parallel-orchestration framing carves a distinct niche, with only minor overlap risk against general single-agent refactor skills, fitting the 4 anchor better than the 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
Dimillian/Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.