Conciseness

Almost all content is product-specific contract Claude could not know (routing tables, flag inventories, cursor-recovery rules), but there is real duplication: “复用 JSON 已返回字段，不以 --verbose/raw/pretty 重复请求” appears in both 执行约束 and 记录稳定约束 (lines 179/186), and “新增或更新只使用真实返回的 ID 回读…全量查询检查 hasMore…” is repeated verbatim within 记录稳定约束 (lines 196–197 vs 200–201), with the timestamp rule also stated twice (lines 178/185). This is the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor — noticeably better than the verbose padded anchor, but the literal duplicate bullets and the very dense 250-line root file keep it from 4.

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: complete commands with flags (`dws aitable +record-query --base-id <ID> --table-id <ID> [--record-ids <IDs>]…`), exact one-shot discovery commands (`dws schema --cli-path "aitable form share get" --compact --format json`), a copy-paste-ready two-line answer template with placeholder conventions, and concrete JSON shapes like `{"options":[{"name":"<选项>"}]}`. This matches the anchor for copy-paste-ready commands covering the common cases.

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step flows are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints — the psql flow (`-l` discover → `-t` columns → `LIMIT 3` → `-c`), write-then-read-back-by-returned-ID, `hasMore`/`partial_success` checks, and a numbered 错误最短路径 with retry/stop rules, so it is above the 'most checkpoints, minor gaps' anchor. It falls short of 5 because the routing is a web of competing precedence rules (intent-routing table '优先于' schema navigation, the form-share gate '优先于' reference navigation, multiple 'not applicable to each other' carve-outs) that the reader must reconcile rather than one coherent sequence, and some checkpoints depend on cross-referenced references.

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is good and real: all 23 cited reference paths resolve to existing one-level-deep files (references/*.md and references/aitable/*.md), and the 按需加载 table maps each trigger condition to exactly one reference with an explicit “不要预加载这些 Reference” guard — matching the good-structure anchor. It stops short of 5 because substantial deep procedural detail (the ~55-line 表单分享用法回答契约 and 返回值评审专用查询 sections, and the inline DWS runtime contract block) is inlined in the root SKILL.md instead of the existing references/aitable/aitable-form.md-style split, and the five scripts in scripts/ are mentioned only generically (“本 Skill 明确发布的脚本”) with no names or paths.

Specificity

The description enumerates a comprehensive set of concrete capability domains — “Base/Table、字段与记录、评论、筛选排序、公式、SQL/PostgreSQL/JOIN、表单分享与 CP 同步、App 页面/Widget、模板、导入导出、仪表盘/图表、附件及审批等数据源同步” — plus concrete trigger artifacts (aitable 命令、form share 合成回执、dry-run、写入恢复方案). It is domain-listing rather than verb-per-action listing, but coverage is comprehensive and nothing is vague, matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions.

Completeness

Both questions are answered explicitly: 'what' via the opening capability sentence and the scope enumeration, and 'when' via the concrete trigger clause “用户给出 aitable 命令、form share 合成回执、dry-run 或询问写入恢复方案时也必须加载本 Skill”. This matches the anchor requiring both what and when with concrete trigger phrases; the added procedural meta-rules are noise but do not leave either half implicit.

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural-term coverage — “钉钉 AI 表格”, “多维表”, “aitable 命令”, “dry-run”, “写入恢复方案”, “表单分享” — but a substantial share of the text is internal contract jargon (“合成 JSON 回执”, “本机 Help/Schema 契约核对”, “CLI 契约评审”) that a user would not naturally say, so it falls just below the comprehensive-synonyms anchor. It is clearly above the 'some relevant keywords, missing variations' anchor because the key product names and both Chinese synonyms for the table product are present.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is unambiguous (DingTalk AITable via the `dws` CLI) and it ends with explicit exclusions routing adjacent intents elsewhere — “不做电子表格单元格操作（走 dingtalk-misc）或文字文档编辑（走 dingtalk-doc）” — giving minimal conflict risk with sibling skills, matching the clear-niche anchor.