Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-guarded operational skill: concrete commands throughout, explicit validation and confirmation checkpoints for risky writes, and proper offloading of the 41KB command reference to bundle files. The only notable weaknesses are redundancy between SOP-1/SOP-2 and between SOP-5 and the hard-constraints section, and some overlap between the inline SOPs and lite-recipes.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Almost entirely dense operational contracts with no teaching of concepts Claude already knows, but SOP-2 substantially repeats SOP-1 and the friend openDingTalkId sourcing rules appear near-verbatim in both SOP-5 and the 高频硬约束 section, so some trimming is possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step is a copy-paste-ready command with exact flags and --format json, plus concrete edge-case handling (sentinel deptId=-1 normalized to deptId=1, status codes translated 1=待接受、3=已成为好友), fully covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five numbered SOPs with explicit sequencing, 禁止 rules, multi-hit disambiguation checkpoints that require user confirmation, mandatory explicit confirmation before the irreversible +friend-remove write, and defined error-recovery paths for unknown flag/command cases. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Bulk material is properly externalized one level deep and clearly signaled (references/contact.md, references/08-directory.md, references/intent-guide.md, references/lite-recipes.md — all verified to exist), but the inline SOP section is long and overlaps content in lite-recipes.md, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |