Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly operational skill body: a Golden Route table maps intents to exact commands, safety defaults and write-verification rules are explicit, and low-frequency detail is properly pushed to one-level-deep references. The only weakness is duplicated policy text — the leaf Schema/Help fallback rules appear in three separate sections and could be stated once.
Suggestions
Consolidate the leaf Schema/Help fallback policy, which is currently repeated nearly verbatim in the 最小 DWS 执行契约, Shortcut 发现, and 错误最短路径 sections — state it once and cross-reference it.
Consider moving the detailed dlink/linkSourceInfo multi-hop resolution rules (当前最短路径, 2 long bullets) into a reference file, since they describe a low-frequency edge case.
The Shortcut 发现 section's second paragraph overlaps heavily with the runtime contract; trim one of them to reduce token cost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is telegraphic and assumes Claude's competence — zero concept-explanation padding — but the Schema/Help fallback policy is restated three times (runtime contract, Shortcut 发现, and 错误最短路径 #2), which could be consolidated. This fits anchor 4 (efficient with minor trimmable repetition) rather than 3, since nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every route is a copy-paste-ready command with exact flags and boundaries, e.g. "dws drive +search --query <关键词> --page-all --max-pages 20 --max-items 500" and the full comment subcommand chain. This matches the fully-executable score-5 anchor; score 4 would require missing key details. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step flows are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints: dry-run before pull/push/sync, copy rule requiring the returned new node ID to differ from the source, "sizeBytes > 0" download checks, "partial_success 不是完成", and a numbered error-recovery path. Destructive/batch operations all have verification and feedback loops, satisfying the rubric cap concern. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The root file is a routing overview; the 按需加载 table maps trigger conditions to four real one-level-deep references (references/intent-guide.md, folder-sync.md, drive.md, lite-recipes.md — all present and non-nesting), with a guardrail forbidding reference reads when Golden Route parameters suffice. Clear overview with well-signaled references, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |