Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent instruction-style skill body: fully executable commands, tightly sequenced SOPs with mandatory validation steps and safety gates for destructive/batch mail operations, and a lean overview that delegates detail to real, clearly-labeled reference and script files. The only refinements worth making are deduplicating the send-mail guidance between the intent table and SOP-3, trimming the shortcuts policy paragraph, and flattening or surfacing the nested recipes/conventions.md reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational — SOPs, command lines, and hard constraints with essentially no concept explanation Claude would already know — but a few spots could be tightened: the send flow appears in both the 意图表 and SOP-3, and the Shortcuts preamble's Schema/Help fallback policy paragraph is long. This fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the every-token-earns-its-place ideal of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every workflow gives copy-paste-ready commands with full flags and placeholders (e.g., "dws mail message send --from <发件邮箱> --to <收件邮箱> --subject \"<主题>\" --content \"<正文>\" --format json", KQL examples like "subject:周报", and runnable scripts "python scripts/mail_unread_summary.py"), covering send, reply, forward, search, unread, and CC cases. This matches the top anchor of fully executable guidance covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four SOPs are explicitly sequenced with 必须/禁止 markers at each step, and validation is built in: SOP-3 step 4 verifies delivery via the returned internetMessageId, batch-delete requires a command preview plus explicit user confirmation before appending --yes, and a single read-back ends the task with a defined conflict-report path. This matches the top anchor of clear sequencing with explicit validation and error-recovery behavior. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-signaled overview pointing one level deep to real files (references/mail.md for command reference, 09-mail.md for multi-step scenarios, intent-guide.md, lite-recipes.md, and two scripts — all verified present), fitting 'good structure; references mostly clear'. It falls short of a 5 because references/recipes/conventions.md is nested two levels deep (reached only via 09-mail.md) and the mandatory ../dingtalk-shared/SKILL.md dependency lives outside the bundle, creating minor navigation gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |