Content
35%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is essentially a table of contents with minimal actionable content in the body itself. While the structure hints at a rigorous gated workflow for A/B test setup, the SKILL.md provides no concrete guidance, examples, templates, or executable steps — everything is deferred to sub-skill files that aren't available. The top-level file needs substantive overview content to be useful on its own.
Suggestions
Add a concise quick-start workflow summary in the body (e.g., a numbered checklist with 1-2 sentence descriptions of each gate and what 'passing' looks like) so the skill is usable without opening every sub-file.
Include at least one concrete example — e.g., a sample hypothesis statement that passes the quality checklist, or a filled-in test record template — to make the skill actionable at the top level.
Explicitly describe the gate/checkpoint logic: what blocks progression, what happens on failure, and how to iterate (feedback loops), rather than just labeling steps as 'Hard Gate' or 'Hard Stop'.
Trim the 'Purpose & Scope' bullets (e.g., 'Prevents peeking') or expand them into actionable constraints — as written they are too vague to guide behavior.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Reasonably brief at the top level, but the 'Purpose & Scope' section includes some filler (e.g., bullet points like 'Prevents peeking' without context are vague rather than efficient). The emoji-heavy headers add visual noise without adding information. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The SKILL.md contains no concrete code, commands, examples, or executable guidance. It is essentially a table of contents pointing to sub-skills, with no actionable content in the body itself — no templates, no checklists, no sample hypotheses or metric definitions. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered sub-skill references imply a sequence (hypothesis → assumptions → test type → metrics → sample size → execution gate), and the 'Hard Gate' / 'Hard Stop' labels suggest validation checkpoints. However, the workflow is not explicitly described in the body — there's no explanation of what happens at gates, no feedback loops, and no description of how to proceed or recover if a gate fails. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill does attempt progressive disclosure by linking to 11 sub-skill files, which is a reasonable structure. However, no bundle files were provided, so we cannot verify the references resolve. More importantly, the top-level SKILL.md provides almost no usable overview content — it's nearly 100% links with no summary of what each sub-skill covers or quick-start guidance, making it hard to use without clicking through every link. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |