A hybrid memory system that provides persistent, searchable knowledge management for AI agents (Architecture, Patterns, Decisions).
67
Quality
52%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Critical
Do not install without reviewing
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.agent/skills/agent-memory-mcp/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
17%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description reads more like a product tagline than actionable skill guidance. It lacks concrete actions (what can Claude actually do with this?), natural trigger terms users would say, and critically missing any 'Use when...' guidance. The technical framing may confuse skill selection in a multi-skill environment.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with natural triggers like 'Use when the user wants to save, recall, or search for project knowledge, architectural decisions, or learned patterns'
Replace abstract language with concrete actions: 'Store architectural decisions, record learned patterns, search past knowledge, retrieve project context'
Include natural keywords users would say: 'remember this', 'what did we decide', 'save for later', 'look up', 'project history'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain ('hybrid memory system', 'knowledge management') and mentions some capabilities ('persistent, searchable') but lacks concrete actions. The parenthetical '(Architecture, Patterns, Decisions)' hints at content types but doesn't describe what actions can be performed. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Partially answers 'what' (knowledge management system) but completely missing 'when' - no 'Use when...' clause or explicit trigger guidance. Users cannot determine when this skill should be selected. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Uses technical jargon ('hybrid memory system', 'AI agents') that users wouldn't naturally say. Missing natural trigger terms like 'remember', 'store', 'recall', 'notes', 'save information', or 'look up'. | 1 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The 'hybrid memory system' and 'AI agents' framing provides some distinctiveness, but 'knowledge management' is generic enough to potentially overlap with note-taking, documentation, or other storage-related skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill with excellent conciseness and actionability. The setup instructions are clear and executable, and the progressive disclosure to sub-skills is well-organized. The main weakness is the lack of validation steps to confirm successful setup (e.g., verifying the MCP server is running).
Suggestions
Add a validation step after 'Start the MCP Server' to verify the server is running correctly (e.g., expected output or a health check command)
Include brief troubleshooting guidance for common setup failures (e.g., port conflicts, missing Node.js version)
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, providing only necessary setup steps and tool references without explaining concepts Claude already knows. No padding or unnecessary context. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands for cloning, installing, compiling, and starting the server. Commands are copy-paste ready with clear examples including variable substitution. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Setup steps are clearly sequenced (clone → install → compile → start), but lacks validation checkpoints. No verification that the server started successfully or troubleshooting guidance if steps fail. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent structure with a concise overview and clear one-level-deep references to sub-skills for each MCP tool. Navigation is well-signaled with linked markdown files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
3395991
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.