Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is a highly actionable, clearly sequenced orchestration workflow with strong validation checkpoints and feedback loops. Its weaknesses are verbosity in design-rationale prose and repeated boilerplate, plus a monolithic structure that could offload per-section detail to reference files.
Suggestions
Trim the spawn-policy rationale blockquotes and editorial asides ('single biggest cost lever', 'where production costs are born') to pure instruction — the batching rules stand without the justification.
State the per-section approval/write-once rule a single time in the Collaborative Protocol instead of repeating 'Write the approved section to file immediately' in all nine sections.
Move the per-section coverage lists and verbatim agent prompts to a reference file (e.g. references/section-briefs.md), keeping SKILL.md as the phase-level overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with operational instruction rather than concept explanation, but contains trimmable design-rationale prose (the spawn-policy blockquotes, 'This is the single biggest cost lever in this skill', 'Ambiguity in asset standards is where production costs are born') and repeated per-section boilerplate ('Write the approved section to file immediately' appears in nearly every section). This matches anchor 3 — mostly efficient with some unnecessary explanation — rather than 4, where only minor instances would remain. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact Grep commands with patterns and flags for retrofit detection, verbatim agent-delegation prompts per section, exact AskUserQuestion option lists, concrete file paths, and explicit fallback rules. This matches anchor 5 — copy-paste-ready commands covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0–6 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: fail-fast on missing game concept, per-section user approval before every write, retrofit section-status detection, conflict-surfacing rules for agent disagreements, and a sign-off gate with a REJECT→re-draft→REVISED feedback loop. This matches anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | External material is well-signaled and one level deep (director-gates.md, automation-modes.md, workflow-modes.md, technical-preferences.md, templates/art-bible.md), but the ~390-line body is somewhat monolithic — per-section coverage lists and delegation prompts could live in a reference file. This matches anchor 4 (good structure, minor organization gaps) rather than 5 (content appropriately split). | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |