milestone-review

Generates a comprehensive milestone progress review including feature completeness, quality metrics, risk assessment, and go/no-go recommendation. Use at milestone checkpoints or when evaluating readiness for a milestone deadline.

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured multi-phase workflow with concrete file paths, an explicit output template, validation gates, and feedback loops for risky decisions. It is lean, actionable, and appropriately references one level of detail.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what a milestone or sprint is, and every phase adds concrete structure (file paths, a template, gate logic) that earns its tokens.	3 / 3
Actionability	Fully executable guidance: concrete paths like 'production/milestones/' and 'production/risk-register/', explicit Task/AskUserQuestion calls, and a copy-paste-ready markdown output template.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear Phase 0–5 sequence with explicit checkpoints — a write-permission gate in Phase 4 and AskUserQuestion feedback loops for OFF TRACK / AT RISK producer verdicts in Phase 3b.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The body is a single well-organized file with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references ('See .claude/docs/director-gates.md for the full check pattern') and no nested-reference problem; no bundle files are needed.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that states concrete capabilities and gives explicit use-when triggers with natural terminology. It answers both what and when without padding or over-claiming.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — 'feature completeness, quality metrics, risk assessment, and go/no-go recommendation' — matching the anchor for listing several specific concrete actions.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('Generates a comprehensive milestone progress review including...') and when ('Use at milestone checkpoints or when evaluating readiness...'), with an explicit trigger clause.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Natural terms a user would say ('milestone checkpoints', 'milestone deadline', 'readiness for a milestone deadline') are well covered rather than buried in jargon.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The milestone-review niche is narrow and the triggers are distinct, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios
Path: .claude/skills/milestone-review/SKILL.md
Commit: 984023d

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.