Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, highly executable skill body: concrete commands, a complete output template, and unusually rigorous validation checkpoints with feedback loops. The main costs are two verbose war-story asides and a large inline template that could be split into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, operational detail throughout — exact greps, file paths, mode gates, and a full output template — but two multi-sentence war-story asides (the 'false clean passes' anecdote and the sprint-plan heading-trap anecdote, ~9% of the body) over-explain rationale and could be trimmed to their rule. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: exact Grep invocations with patterns, globs, and -A flags; concrete file paths (production/sprints/, production/sprint-status.yaml, production/epics/**/story-*.md); verbatim AskUserQuestion prompts with enumerated options; and a complete copy-paste output template covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0-5 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (FOUND/ABSENT input check before any report, NOT ASSESSED protocol, zero-match sprint handling, mode gate before spawning PR-MILESTONE, write confirmation) and feedback loops for error recovery ('Supply the input and re-run PR-MILESTONE', 'Do not issue a GO against an OFF TRACK verdict'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to .claude/docs/director-gates.md, automation-modes.md, and config-resolution.md are one level deep and clearly signaled (with explicit 'do not read it in the parent session' guidance), but the ~80-line inline output template and the long NOT-ASSESSED protocol are inlined content that would sit more naturally in a references/ file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |