Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered orchestration workflow: unambiguous sequencing, per-phase decision gates, return contracts, and an unusually strong verify-the-artifact error-recovery loop. Its weaknesses are redundancy — the write-authorization exception is argued twice at length — and inline policy prose that should be split into a reference file, since the bundle ships no supporting files at all.
Suggestions
State the bounded write exception once (keep the 'Why this does not violate the Collaboration Protocol' block, and reduce the 'File Write Protocol' section to a two-line pointer to it).
Move the team.size collapse rationale and the 'enforced but never surfaced' justification into a short reference doc (e.g. references/active-set.md) and keep one summary line plus the announce-the-active-set rule inline.
Consolidate the three scattered `.claude/docs/...` pointers into a single 'References' section so the external documentation surface is visible at a glance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The operational core (steps, gates, write paths, return contract) is efficient and assumes competence, but it is padded with meta-justification: the ~15-line 'team.size collapse' rationale ('The pipeline below reads as a multi-agent fan-out and at the shipped default it is one or two agents...'), the 'constraint that is enforced but never surfaced' philosophy paragraph, and the bounded-exception rationale stated twice (the 'Why this does not violate the Collaboration Protocol' block and again in 'File Write Protocol'). This is anchor 3 — mostly efficient but with unnecessary explanation that could be tightened — not anchor 4's 'minor instances'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: exact `subagent_type` values, a per-agent write-path table with slugged filenames, a verbatim return contract to append to every prompt, an exact surface message for missing adjacent areas, and explicit gate prompts. It falls short of anchor 5 because key behavior (automation modes, config-resolution defaults, the full error-recovery procedure) is delegated to `.claude/docs/...` files that are not part of this bundle, leaving minor gaps the agent cannot resolve from the skill alone. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The pipeline is a clearly sequenced five-step process with an explicit `AskUserQuestion` gate after each phase, defined BLOCKING-concern handling ('Do NOT proceed to Step 5 without the user acknowledging any BLOCKING accessibility concerns'), a verdict system (COMPLETE/BLOCKED), and an error-recovery protocol that opens by verifying the artifact ('a named artifact that is not on disk is a failed phase, however fluent the response reads') — matching anchor 5's explicit validation steps and feedback loops for a batch operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle has no references/, scripts/, or assets/ files, so the skill is a single ~270-line document; protocol rationale (the Collaboration-Protocol exception, automation-mode scoping rules, team.size collapse policy) is inlined prose that belongs in a one-level-deep reference file. The body does point to `.claude/docs/automation-modes.md`, `config-resolution.md`, and `error-recovery-protocol.md`, but those live outside the skill bundle and are referenced in passing rather than clearly signaled — anchor 3's 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |