Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable orchestration pipeline with clear validation checkpoints and error feedback loops; the only meaningful weakness is mild verbosity in the ethics and error-recovery sections.
Suggestions
Tighten the Phase 7 ethics-review and Error Recovery Protocol blocks by collapsing the long inline flag strings into concise rules, moving the full flag wording to a reference if the skill grows.
Consider extracting the per-phase delegation details (subagent_type + output) into a short reference table to reduce repeated role listings across Team Composition and How to Delegate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but the lengthy ethics-review and error-recovery sections could be tightened; some phrasing is more detailed than strictly necessary. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance: explicit subagent_type mappings, specific file paths (e.g., design/live-ops/economy-rules.md, ethics-policy.md), named output documents, and exact AskUserQuestion options — copy-ready despite being instruction-only. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-phase pipeline with explicit validation checkpoints (ethics review gate, BLOCKED verdict handling) and a feedback-loop error-recovery protocol that surfaces, assesses, and offers retry/skip options. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are present, so the single SKILL.md carries well-organized, clearly headed sections (Team Composition, Pipeline, Output Documents, Error Recovery) — appropriate for a skill that needs no external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |