Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exceptionally well-sequenced, highly actionable workflow with real validation gates and a genuine recovery path, and its per-mode reference routing is exemplary. Its weakness is bulk: four full placeholder skeletons and repeated justification blockquotes are inlined in SKILL.md instead of living in reference files, doubling its token footprint without adding decision-relevant guidance.
Suggestions
Move the four skeletons to a reference file (e.g. references/skeletons.md) or generate them from the existing templates, keeping only the section-heading lists inline in SKILL.md.
Trim the multi-line justificatory blockquotes (e.g. the accessibility-path warning and the circular-remediation note) to one line each — the rule survives without the rationale paragraphs.
Move the Phase 2 read-list details for stable, rarely-changing inputs (e.g. the project.yaml platform-block fallback rules) into a reference so the main body stays a decision-oriented overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 340 of the ~815 body lines are four inlined skeletons made almost entirely of repeated "[To be designed]" placeholders, and several long blockquote justifications pad the flow. This is noticeably verbose with padded sections (anchor 2) rather than merely 'could be tightened' (anchor 3); the padding is structural, not incidental. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: exact file paths, a copy-ready command (Grep pattern="^#+ .*UI Requirements" glob="design/gdd/*.md" output_mode="content" -A 20), scripted AskUserQuestion prompts with enumerated options, and concrete derivation rules for input methods. Specific examples cover the common cases; nothing is left as vague direction. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 1-8 are clearly sequenced with a per-section Context->Questions->Options->Decision->Draft->Approval->Write cycle, retrofit-mode detection before writing, a Phase 5 cross-reference checklist, and a Phase 7 recovery/resume procedure. Validation checkpoints are explicit at every write, matching the top anchor including error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle references (references/sections-ux-spec.md, sections-hud.md, sections-patterns.md) exist, are one level deep, and are clearly signaled via a mode-routing table with 'read only the file matching the mode' — but ~42% of the body is inlined skeleton/template content that belongs in a separate reference file. Anchor 3 (content that should be separate is inline) fits better than 4 because the inlining is substantial, though the signaling itself is strong. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |