CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

openspec-continue-change

Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.

72

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable CLI workflow skill with clear sequencing, a verification checkpoint, and clean section organization. Its only drag is mild redundancy between the Steps and Guardrails sections.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and free of generic concept explanation, but the 'context/rules are constraints not content' note and the 'create ONE artifact' rule are each restated across Steps and Guardrails, so it could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

It provides concrete, copy-pasteable CLI commands (openspec list/status/instructions with --json) and enumerates the exact JSON fields to parse, meeting the 'fully executable, specific examples' anchor.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are explicitly sequenced with status-based branching and a Guardrails checklist that includes an explicit verification checkpoint ('Verify the artifact file exists after writing before marking progress').

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, so content is self-contained; it is organized into clearly headed sections (Input, Steps, Output, Artifact Creation Guidelines, Guardrails) with easy navigation and no nested references.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description with an explicit 'Use when' trigger and a clear niche. The only weak spot is specificity, which describes a single focused action rather than enumerating multiple concrete capabilities.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain ('OpenSpec change') and a concrete action ('creating the next artifact'), but does not list multiple distinct concrete actions, matching the 'names domain and some actions' anchor rather than the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

2 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly answers both 'what' ('Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact') and 'when' via an explicit 'Use when...' clause, satisfying the top anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It offers several natural phrasings a user would say ('progress their change', 'create the next artifact', 'continue their workflow'), giving good coverage of natural trigger terms.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The OpenSpec/change/artifact niche with CLI-specific triggers is clearly distinct and unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
Draculabo/AntigravityManager
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.