Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, actionable onboarding workflow with concrete commands and templates and good checkpointing, but it is monolithic and verbose for a single SKILL.md with no progressive disclosure via separate files.
Suggestions
Move the command-reference table and the artifact templates (proposal/spec/design/tasks skeletons) into reference files under ./references/ and link to them, reducing the SKILL.md to an overview plus phase sequence.
De-duplicate the command-reference table (it appears in both the Recap and the Quick-exit section) into a single shared reference.
Add an explicit verification feedback loop before the Archive phase (e.g. run /opsx:verify and only archive when it passes) to push workflow_clarity toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly actionable scripted material rather than concept over-explanation, but ~540 lines with heavy display templates and a duplicated command-reference table that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable openspec/git commands and concrete artifact templates (Why/What Changes, WHEN/THEN/AND scenarios, Goals/Non-Goals); placeholders and heuristic codebase scanning leave minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 11-phase sequence with explicit PAUSE checkpoints, a preflight init-validation gate, guardrails, and a task checklist, but lacks an in-skill verify-before-archive feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single monolithic ~540-line file with no bundle files and no references; command reference, artifact templates, and exit scripts are all inlined and could be split out. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |