Conciseness

The body is mostly dense, actionable reference material, but the Prerequisites section spelling out Python installation across macOS/Ubuntu/Windows over-explains something Claude already knows, and several large inlined do/don't tables could be trimmed. It is above 2 (most content earns its place) but below 4 due to the OS-specific install padding.

Actionability

Every step ships copy-paste-ready, fully executable commands (e.g. `python3 skills/ui-ux-pro-max/scripts/search.py "beauty spa wellness service" --design-system -p "Serenity Spa"`) plus concrete need-to-domain tables and a worked example, matching 'Fully executable; copy-paste ready; specific examples cover the common cases'.

Workflow Clarity

The process is clearly sequenced (Step 1 analyze → Step 2 design-system → 2b persist → 3 supplement → 4 stack) with a full worked example, and the Pre-Delivery Checklist acts as a verification checkpoint. It is below 5 because the main workflow lacks an explicit validate-before-deliver checkpoint inline (the checklist is separate), and above 3 since checkpoints are largely present.

Progressive Disclosure

Scripts are appropriately offloaded to scripts/ (core.py, design_system.py, search.py) and invoked via clear commands, but there is no references/ or assets/ directory, and substantial reference material (the four 'Common Rules' do/don't tables, full domain/stack tables, and the pre-delivery checklist) is inlined rather than split into one-level-deep reference files. This matches 'Some structure but content that should be separate is inline'; it is above 2 (good section structure and real script references) but below 4.

Specificity

The description names the domain ('UI/UX design') but lists no concrete actions, only the vague phrases 'design intelligence' and 'searchable database', matching the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic'. It is above 1 because a domain is named, but below 3 since no concrete actions (e.g. generate palettes, recommend typography) are stated.

Completeness

It offers only a vague 'what' ('design intelligence with searchable database') and entirely lacks a 'when'/'Use when...' clause, matching the anchor 'Has a vague what and no when'. Per the guideline, a missing explicit trigger clause caps completeness at 3, and the vague 'what' pulls it to 2 rather than 3.

Trigger Term Quality

'UI/UX design' is a somewhat natural keyword, but 'design intelligence' and 'searchable database' are jargon, and common trigger phrases users actually say ('landing page', 'color palette', 'dashboard', 'design a UI') are missing. It is above 1 (one recognizable term) but below 3 because natural variations/synonyms are absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'UI/UX design' is a recognizable niche with lower conflict risk against non-design skills, but the generic phrasing ('design intelligence', 'searchable database') leaves overlap risk with other design skills, matching 'Somewhat specific but could still overlap'. It is below 4 because the wording is too generic to establish a clear distinct niche.