Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, actionable, and clearly sequenced for a judgment-style analytical skill, with a strong output schema and thresholds. Its main weakness is redundant signal listings across several sections that bloat the token budget without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Consolidate the overlapping bullish/bearish signal lists in 'Identify Sentiment Extremes', 'Sentiment Patterns', and 'Warning Signs' into a single section to remove duplicated euphoria/capitulation/contrarian entries.
Add a concrete sanity-check step in the workflow that reconciles the proposed eval_note against price-action correlation (sentiment leads vs. lags vs. diverges) before finalizing the output.
Optionally name concrete sentiment data sources or retrieval cues (e.g. where to obtain the Fear & Greed index) so the analysis step is executable rather than purely interpretive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient bullet lists with little concept-padding, but the signal listings are duplicated across 'Identify Sentiment Extremes', 'Sentiment Patterns', and 'Warning Signs' (euphoria, capitulation, 'this time is different', 'going to zero' recur), which is unnecessary repetition that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete JSON output schema with field definitions and specific numeric thresholds (Fear & Greed bands) plus concrete flag lists, but offers no executable mechanism or named data sources for actually retrieving or measuring sentiment, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six numbered analysis steps are clearly sequenced and converge on a structured output, and the skill is judgment-producing rather than destructive so the validation cap does not apply; however, an explicit sanity-check/feedback loop (e.g. reconciling the eval against price action) is missing, preventing a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-purpose analytical skill with no external references needed; its sections (Overview, Instructions, Output Format, Patterns, Best Practices, Warning Signs) are well-organized, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |