Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable trading-strategy framework with concrete decision rules and a clear output schema. Its main weaknesses are token weight from generic best-practice/common-mistake lists Claude already knows and a lack of progressive disclosure via separate reference files.
Suggestions
Trim or move the 'Best Practices' and 'Common Mistakes to Avoid' sections into a separate reference file, keeping only non-obvious guidance inline to improve conciseness.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow (e.g. 'Confirm the Strong Conviction checklist passes before issuing a BUY/SELL; otherwise default to HOLD') to strengthen feedback loops.
Split the detailed eval_note scale and position-sizing matrix into a referenced reference file so SKILL.md reads as an overview with one-level-deep navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete decision rules and an output template, but the 'Best Practices' (10 items) and 'Common Mistakes to Avoid' (10 items) sections largely restate generic trading wisdom Claude already knows and could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, actionable guidance including a numeric eval_note scale with specific ranges, a position-sizing matrix, entry/exit placement rules, and a copy-paste-ready JSON output schema, though some entry/exit guidance remains qualitative rather than executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 1-8 sequence (synthesize -> resolve conflicts -> eval_note -> risk -> sizing -> entry/exit -> timeframes -> regime) is reinforced by a Strong Conviction checklist and Trade Rejection criteria that act as validation gates, but there are no explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is well-organized with clear headers, but at ~200 lines it is a single monolithic document with no external references; sections like the detailed eval_note scale, best practices, and common mistakes are inlined rather than split into one-level-deep reference files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |