Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an effective overview that routes three distinct workflows to specific, real reference files with clear mode detection and explicit approval/validation checkpoints. Its main weaknesses are duplicated file descriptions across sections, a referenced samples/ directory missing from the bundle, and one vague external-skill reference.
Suggestions
Merge the "Baseline Sources" and "References" sections into one list so each reference file is described exactly once, trimming the duplicated descriptions of semantic-reference.md, intake-and-constraints.md, and validation-policy-and-reporting.md (conciseness).
Fix the dangling "samples/" reference: either include the samples directory in the bundle or remove/reword the fallback-consultation instruction, since an agent following it will hit a nonexistent path (progressive_disclosure).
Replace the vague "A skill covering full SD access patterns and Grail-table documentation" bullet with the actual skill name or a resolvable path so the DQL-pattern reference is actionable (progressive_disclosure).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean, pointer-based overview with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the References section re-describes three files already described under "Baseline Sources" (semantic-reference.md, intake-and-constraints.md, validation-policy-and-reporting.md) and "Scope" repeats the workflow list — trimmable duplication that keeps it below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, instruction-only guidance: "Always run the intake checklist in references/intake-and-constraints.md before generating or validating a mapping", hard rules ("never require scan events for detection", "Do NOT raise critical/major issues for fields on that list"), and a mode table pointing to exact procedural sections; the executable detail lives in the reference files, leaving minor gaps versus fully copy-paste-ready guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three modes are disambiguated by input in a table, with explicit checkpoints ("Phase 1 mapping table → user approval → Phase 2", "REQUIRED Step 0", and the partial-draft fallback when intake is incomplete), but the detailed validate→fix feedback loops are delegated to the reference files rather than sequenced here, so the 5 anchor's explicit in-body validation loops are not met. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good one-level-deep structure where all five referenced references/*.md files exist and cited anchors resolve (#validation-rules, § Workflow A), but the body cites a "samples/" baseline-source directory that does not exist in the bundle and includes a vague unresolvable pointer ("A skill covering full SD access patterns and Grail-table documentation"), which are minor navigation gaps short of the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |