Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-sequenced, largely actionable phased workflow with explicit validation, but it is somewhat verbose in Phase 0 and references a bundled preprocessing script that is not present in the skill bundle. Tightening the plugin-root block and ensuring the referenced script exists would lift conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Include the referenced './extract-domain-context.py' in a scripts/ bundle (or document where it lives) so the Phase 2 command is executable as written.
Compress the Phase 0 plugin-root candidate list and its error output into a shorter probe loop to reduce token weight.
Spell out the 'standard graph validation pipeline' in Phase 5 with the actual command or a one-level reference, so the validation checkpoint is fully actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The phased body is mostly operational and earns its tokens, but the Phase 0 plugin-root resolution block (a long list of candidate paths with verbose error output) and repeated re-explanation of the data-directory logic could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable bash (worktree redirect, $UA_DIR resolution, git freshness diffs) and specific file paths for each phase; later phases are more declarative but the overall guidance is copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Phases 0–6 sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint in Phase 5 and error-tolerance ('save what's valid') handling; the freshness preflight degrades gracefully rather than blocking. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-labeled, but the body references a bundled script './extract-domain-context.py' (Phase 2) that is absent from the bundle, and large operational detail lives inline; references are not cleanly backed by the bundle structure. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |