understand-explain

Use when you need a deep-dive explanation of a specific file, function, or module in the codebase

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./understand-anything-plugin/skills/understand-explain/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with a clear, validated workflow, but it does not fully leverage progressive disclosure and carries a sizable inline reference block that keeps conciseness just under the top anchor.

Suggestions

Move the Graph Structure Reference schema into a separate references/graph-schema.md and link to it, keeping SKILL.md a lean overview that points to the detail.

Tighten the Graph Structure Reference by trimming node/edge/layer/tour fields not needed for the explain workflow, improving token efficiency.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient and the custom graph schema is justified domain knowledge Claude lacks, but the multi-paragraph Graph Structure Reference is a sizable inline block that could be tightened or split out, keeping it just below a 3.	2 / 3
Actionability	It provides copy-paste-ready shell commands (UA_DIR resolution, the git diff/ls-files block) and concrete Grep targets ("filePath", "name", edge "source"/"target"), giving specific executable guidance throughout the workflow.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The 8 steps are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints — the UA_DIR/knowledge-graph existence check and the graph-freshness feedback loop (warn and suggest re-running /understand) — matching the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are well organized, but the skill is larger than a simple sub-50-line skill and keeps a substantial Graph Structure Reference inline with no one-level-deep reference file, so content that could be separate remains inline.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has a clear explicit trigger and answers both what and when, but it is thin on action variety and trigger-term coverage, and is only moderately distinct from generic code-explanation skills.

Suggestions

Add concrete actions beyond 'explanation' (e.g., 'summarizes the component, traces its dependencies, and explains its data flow') to raise specificity.

Include natural trigger variations users would actually say, such as 'explain', 'understand', or 'walk me through this file/function'.

Differentiate from generic code-explanation skills by noting the knowledge-graph/dependency-context basis, which lowers conflict risk.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain (codebase) and concrete targets ("file, function, or module") but offers only one action ("deep-dive explanation"), so it names the domain and some actions without being comprehensive rather than listing multiple specific actions.	2 / 3
Completeness	It contains an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause and answers both what (deep-dive explanation of a specific component) and when (when you need that explanation), satisfying the explicit-trigger requirement that enables a 3.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	It includes relevant natural terms ("deep-dive explanation", "file", "function", "module", "codebase") but misses common variations a user would actually say like "explain", "understand", or "walk me through".	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Targeting "a specific file, function, or module" is somewhat specific, but "explain this function" could plausibly trigger generic code-explanation skills since nothing in the description signals the knowledge-graph dependency-context basis.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything
Path: understand-anything-plugin/skills/understand-explain/SKILL.md
Commit: 6ae7187

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.