CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

app-store-review

Full-lifecycle Apple App Store review for iOS and iPadOS apps. Use for pre-submission audits, rejection diagnosis and Resolution Center replies, Guideline 4.3 spam or similarity recovery, human-craft and low-effort audits, Apple design and Human Interface Guidelines audits of native interaction, motion, gestures, materials, haptics, accessibility, and iPad adaptation, App Review Notes, privacy manifests, Info.plist permission strings, subscriptions, Sign in with Apple, account deletion, UGC, third-party AI consent, TestFlight or App Store readiness, visual HTML review reports, and vague requests such as "review my app" or "will Apple approve this" when an Xcode, Expo, React Native, or Flutter project is present.

66

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a deliberately thin compatibility loader: lean and clearly worded, but it delegates the entire review workflow to a root SKILL.md that is not present in this bundle, leaving the actual steps, validation, and references unverifiable from this file alone.

Suggestions

Inline a concise summary of the core review workflow (key steps and a validation/verification checkpoint) so the skill is actionable even if the root file is not resolvable.

Ensure the referenced ../../SKILL.md and its references/, scripts/, and evals/ paths are present in the bundle, or restructure so SKILL.md is self-contained.

Add an explicit validation step for destructive/batch review actions (e.g., confirming rejection-cause evidence before drafting a Resolution Center reply) to satisfy the workflow-clarity feedback-loop requirement.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Four short sentences with no concept over-explanation; every token earns its place and the body assumes Claude's competence, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides one concrete, executable directive ('Read ../../SKILL.md completely') and a path-resolution rule, but the substantive review workflow, code, and commands live entirely in the unresolved root file, leaving key details absent.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a multi-step review process yet the body lists no sequenced steps and no validation checkpoints, outsourcing the entire workflow to a root file; the rough routing is coherent but steps and checkpoints are absent.

2 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

One-level-deep references are clearly signaled in concept, but no references/, scripts/, assets/, or evals/ bundle exists locally and the referenced ../../SKILL.md does not resolve, so navigation does not hold up against the actual bundle structure.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is comprehensive, specific, and well-targeted: it states a clear purpose, enumerates concrete review tasks, and lists explicit natural-language triggers including vague-request phrasings. Voice is correctly third person throughout.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Enumerates many concrete actions (pre-submission audits, rejection diagnosis, Resolution Center replies, Guideline 4.3 recovery, HIG audits, privacy manifests, Info.plist strings, subscriptions, account deletion, HTML reports), matching the 'multiple specific concrete actions; comprehensive coverage' anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states what ('Full-lifecycle Apple App Store review for iOS and iPadOS apps') and when ('Use for...') with concrete trigger phrases, satisfying the top anchor for both what and when.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrasings ('review my app', 'will Apple approve this') plus synonyms and project types (Xcode, Expo, React Native, Flutter), matching the comprehensive coverage anchor.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear Apple App Store review niche with distinct triggers (Guideline 4.3, Resolution Center, TestFlight) and minimal overlap with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
ElxMaj/app-store-review-skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.