CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

seedance-examples-zh

This skill should be used when the user asks for Chinese Seedance 2.0 examples, Chinese prompt patterns, example rewrites, or safe versions of working Chinese video-generation prompts.

64

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/seedance-examples-zh/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, highly actionable example skill with concrete copy-paste Chinese prompt patterns, a clear label taxonomy, an explicit rewrite rule, and a defined output contract. Its only weakness is a short philosophical 'Intent' paragraph that adds tokens without aiding execution.

Suggestions

Tighten or remove the 'Intent' paragraph; replace the manifesto with a one-line operational note such as 'Match the user's idea to the closest example pattern and let them feel the gap to close it themselves.'

Optionally make the implied workflow explicit with a short ordered sequence (classify with labels -> rewrite if protected identity is present -> return per the Output Contract) to reinforce the otherwise-implicit flow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean concrete example prompts and tight guidance, but the 'Intent' paragraph ('Some users learn by rule... An example that teaches is worth ten instructions') is philosophical prose that does not aid execution and could be trimmed.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready Chinese example prompts per scenario, a specific rewrite transformation ('知名IP角色' becomes '原创蒙面屋顶信使'), a label table, and an explicit output contract provide fully actionable, specific guidance.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

As a simple single-purpose skill the action is unambiguous — classify via labels, apply the rewrite pattern when protected identity appears, and return per the output contract — so it qualifies for the simple-skill allowance of 3.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the skill is self-contained under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Intent, Example Labels, Safe Example Patterns, Rewrite Pattern, Output Contract), meeting the simple-skill allowance of 3.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

72%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A clearly targeted, distinctive description with strong natural triggers, but it phrases capability purely as 'use when the user asks for X' rather than stating the actions the skill performs, leaving the 'what' implicit. Tightening it to lead with an explicit verb would raise both specificity and completeness.

Suggestions

Lead the description with an explicit action verb, e.g. 'Generates Chinese Seedance 2.0 example prompts, prompt patterns, and safe rewrites of video-generation prompts. Use when the user asks for...' to make the 'what' explicit.

State the concrete deliverables as actions ('provides example rewrites', 'produces safe variants') rather than only as trigger objects, so completeness is not dependent on inference.

Keep the distinctive niche framing intact; it is the description's strongest dimension and should be preserved in any rewrite.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Chinese Seedance 2.0... video-generation prompts') and concrete deliverable types (examples, prompt patterns, example rewrites, safe versions), but states them only as trigger objects with no action verbs, so it does not reach the 'multiple specific concrete actions' bar of 3.

2 / 3

Completeness

The 'when' is explicit and strong, but the 'what' is conveyed only through object nouns (no verb such as 'generates', 'provides', or 'rewrites'), so the capability must be inferred rather than being clearly stated as a concrete action.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases a user would say ('Chinese Seedance 2.0 examples', 'Chinese prompt patterns', 'example rewrites', 'safe versions of working Chinese video-generation prompts') are present with good variation coverage and an explicit 'should be used when the user asks for' clause.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is narrow and specific (Chinese-language Seedance 2.0 video-generation prompt examples), with triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
Emily2040/seedance-2.0
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.