CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

seedance-interview-short

This skill should be used when the user wants a fast Seedance 2.0 creative brief, a short interview, a compressed intake flow, or a quick director-style clarification before prompt writing.

66

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-organized and highly actionable, with a clear sequenced workflow, a concrete brief template, and explicit routing. Its weaknesses are some philosophical padding in the Intent section and inline references to bundle files that do not exist in the skill directory.

Suggestions

Trim the poetic prose in the Intent section (e.g. "The soul of this skill is restraint", "Speed is the form their trust takes") to lean directive language.

Provide the referenced files (interview-starters, directing-engine) in the references/ bundle, or remove the [ref:...] markers if the inline guidance is meant to be self-contained.

Clarify the third interview question, which currently packs multiple sub-questions into one line and may be hard to apply verbatim.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but the Intent section adds poetic padding ("The soul of this skill is restraint", "Speed is the form their trust takes") that does not earn its tokens, fitting the anchor for mostly efficient with some unnecessary prose.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete executable guidance: a capped three-question prioritized list with pickable defaults, a field-by-field Compact Brief Pattern template, explicit routing targets, and a word-counted Output Contract - copy-ready instruction rather than vague direction.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The process is clearly sequenced with explicit decision checkpoints - ask at most three questions only if materially relevant, skip straight to a brief when enough info is supplied, then route - which for this non-destructive conversational skill meets the clear-sequence standard.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

References are clearly signaled one level deep inline ([ref:interview-starters], [ref:directing-engine]), but the referenced bundle files are not present in references/scripts/assets, so the navigation is broken; this fits the anchor for structure present but not fully realized.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and well-scoped, explicitly pairing concrete actions with a clear 'use when' trigger. Its only weakness is a few specialized terms ("compressed intake flow", "director-style clarification") that are less natural as user-spoken triggers.

Suggestions

Replace or supplement jargon like "compressed intake flow" and "director-style clarification" with everyday phrasings a user would actually say, e.g. "a few quick questions" or "fast creative brief".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions - "fast Seedance 2.0 creative brief", "short interview", "compressed intake flow", "quick director-style clarification before prompt writing" - matching the anchor for listing several specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what it does (brief/intake/clarification actions) and when to use it via "This skill should be used when the user wants...", matching the anchor that clearly answers both what AND when with explicit triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrasings users might say ("short interview", "creative brief", "quick clarification") but mixes in jargon ("compressed intake flow", "director-style clarification") that everyday users would be less likely to voice, fitting the anchor for some relevant keywords with missing common variations.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to a clear niche (Seedance 2.0 fast/short briefs) with distinct triggers, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; the "fast/short" qualifier separates it from longer interview variants.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
Emily2040/seedance-2.0
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.