CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

seedance-interview

This skill should be used when the user wants creative guidance, story development, scene planning, or a director interview to turn a Seedance 2.0 idea into a production-ready prompt - adapting to users who have no idea yet, a rough concept, or precise professional direction in shots, lenses, and blocking.

66

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Highly actionable, well-sequenced instructional content that leverages clear branching and externalized references to stay lean. Its main weakness is that the progressive-disclosure references point to bundle files that are absent, so the offloaded detail is not actually reachable.

Suggestions

Add the missing references/ bundle files (e.g., interview-starters, pro-filmmaking-standards, cinematography-shot-language, directing-engine, reference-workflow) so the `[ref:...]` links resolve.

Consolidate the repeated three-tier (no-idea / rough-idea / professional) framing into a single section and cross-reference it to reduce restated prose.

Verify that every `[skill:seedance-*]` and `[ref:...]` target exists or is intentionally deferred, to avoid dangling navigation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~120-line body is mostly high-signal instruction with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but it restates the three-tier framing across several sections and carries illustrative prose that could be trimmed, fitting the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-ready, concrete guidance throughout — verbatim scripts ("Pick one, mix two, or describe your own - or say surprise me..."), exact default phrasings, a priority question table with per-question defaults, and a feeling-to-film mapping table — fully actionable without code.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequenced Process (steps 1–6) with explicit user-type conditionals, single-clip vs. sequence branching, output routing, and an explicit Propose-Then-Adjust feedback loop, matching the clear-sequence-with-feedback anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body correctly externalizes detail via well-signaled one-level-deep `[ref:...]` tags, but the referenced files (interview-starters, pro-filmmaking-standards, etc.) do not exist — there is no references/ bundle directory — so the navigation targets do not resolve, leaving the structure only partially realized.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that explicitly covers both capability and trigger conditions for a well-defined niche. It is slightly verbose and uses some skill-internal phrasing that dampens trigger-term naturalness.

Suggestions

Tighten the description and replace skill-internal phrasing (e.g., "no idea yet, a rough concept") with terms a user would actually say.

Add common user-facing variations of the trigger terms (e.g., "make a Seedance video," "turn my idea into a prompt") to broaden natural coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ("creative guidance, story development, scene planning, or a director interview") and a concrete deliverable ("production-ready prompt"), plus distinct adaptive tiers — matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("turn a Seedance 2.0 idea into a production-ready prompt") and when ("This skill should be used when the user wants..."), satisfying the anchor for clearly answering both.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Plausible natural terms appear ("creative guidance," "story development," "scene planning," "director interview") and the niche trigger "Seedance 2.0," but phrasing leans skill-internal ("no idea yet, a rough concept") and lacks common user-facing variations, so it sits between anchors 2 and 3.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tightly scoped to Seedance 2.0 video-prompt authoring with distinct, niche-specific triggers, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
Emily2040/seedance-2.0
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.