Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A richly operational body with concrete question pools, translation tables, and a clear sequenced process, weakened mainly by rhetorical padding and by inline references that point to bundle files which are not present in the skill directory.
Suggestions
Trim rhetorical passages (the 'front door' metaphor, the Intent philosophy block, and repeated Director's-Read restatements) to tighten conciseness toward the lean anchor.
Add the missing reference bundle files (directors-read.md, pro-filmmaking-standards.md, cinematography-shot-language.md, interview-starters.md, reference-workflow.md, directing-engine.md) to references/, or remove the dead links, so progressive disclosure resolves to real content.
Sharpen the conditional directing guidance ('set one coherent setup... rather than a generic cinematic look') into a concrete decision rule or example to lift actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient operational content (numbered rules, question-pool table, translation table), but it carries noticeable rhetorical padding — the 'front door' metaphor, the 'Intent' philosophy passage, and roughly five restatements to load the Director's Read — that could be trimmed without loss. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction-only skill: exact questions with defaults ('not sure? I'll go with [default]'), a feeling-to-film translation table, a Starting Points menu, and a 6-step Process; minor gaps remain in conditional guidance such as 'set one coherent setup... rather than a generic cinematic look'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step Process sequences read-user → question pool → genre path → pro intake → sequence branch → standalone routing, with an explicit propose-then-adjust feedback loop ('Treat their reaction as the second interview round'); no formal validation checkpoint, but the skill is non-destructive so the cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure and inline signaling are good — references to directors-read.md, pro-filmmaking-standards.md, cinematography-shot-language.md, interview-starters.md, reference-workflow.md, and directing-engine.md are clearly linked — but none of those bundle files exist in references/, so the one-level-deep disclosure does not actually resolve to real files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |