Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured instruction-only skill with concrete copy-paste prompt examples and a clear output contract; its only weakness is mild redundancy in restating the physical-plausibility thesis across the opening, Intent, and Effects Contract sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and avoids explaining basics Claude already knows, but the source->journey->ending thesis is restated roughly three times (opening paragraph, the Intent section's "source, a journey, and an ending", and the Effects Contract) with mildly florid prose such as "wonder dies the moment it stops obeying physics," so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It supplies copy-paste-ready "Prompt-ready phrase" examples per effect type, concrete integration directives, a `forms -> travels -> dissipates` timing template, and an explicit Output Contract, which is highly actionable guidance for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | As a single-purpose skill, its action is unambiguous: produce the VFX contract, stability constraints, and a prompt-ready phrase, sequenced via the source->journey->endpoint contract with a defined deliverable in the Output Contract; no validation loop is required for non-destructive prompt generation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no need for external references and no bundle files present, the well-organized sections (Intent, Effects Contract table, Integration Rules, Timing and Dissipation, Output Contract) meet the bar for full marks on progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |