seedance-vocab-ru

This skill should be used when the user asks for Russian Seedance 2.0 prompt wording, Russian cinematic vocabulary, or translation of camera, lighting, action, VFX, audio, and production terms into Russian.

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/seedance-vocab-ru/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, mostly lean instruction skill with a useful inline Russian-wording table and template, but its central workflow depends on two referenced files (directors-read.md, vocab/ru.md) that are not shipped, undermining actionability, workflow execution, and progressive disclosure. It reads well in isolation but cannot be fully executed as written.

Suggestions

Ship the referenced bundle files (references/directors-read.md and references/vocab/ru.md) so the repeated 'load ...' instructions can actually be performed, or inline the essential vocabulary/slop/dialogue tables directly in SKILL.md.

Add an explicit validation checkpoint — e.g., confirm reference tags (@Image1, @Video1, @Audio1) are preserved unchanged and that slop words were decomposed into physical elements — before returning the final wording, to give the workflow a feedback loop.

Tighten the opening paragraph: replace abstract phrasing like 'translate that record into visible or audible carriers' and 'keep its internal labels out of final generation prose' with a concrete instruction stated in terms of the output the user receives.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding about what Russian or a camera is, with tight sections and a copy-pasteable table. It falls short of 5 because the opening paragraph and phrases like 'visible or audible carriers' / 'keep its internal labels out of final generation prose' are slightly denser than needed.	4 / 5
Actionability	Concrete Russian wording, a Compact Pattern template, and named slop words give real executable guidance, but the skill repeatedly defers its core vocabulary ('Load vocab/ru for dense role-binding ... vocabulary', 'load the Slop Traps table', 'load the Russian Dialogue Notes') to ../../references/vocab/ru.md, which is not shipped — leaving a key executable gap.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A coherent sequence is present (load Director's Read -> classify brief -> complete canonical record -> translate into carriers), but the first step loads ../../references/directors-read.md which does not exist, and there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops, so the sequence cannot be executed and verified as written.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Section structure is well organized and references are clearly signaled one level deep via markdown links, but the bundle directories (references/, scripts/, assets/) are absent and the two referenced files (directors-read.md, vocab/ru.md) do not exist anywhere, so the references do not resolve — a navigation failure that caps the score.	3 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete capabilities across multiple production-term categories, gives explicit 'use when' triggers, and carves out a distinct Russian/Seedance niche. Its only minor weakness is trigger phrasing that leans on product jargon rather than covering a wider mesh of synonyms.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete action areas — 'prompt wording', 'cinematic vocabulary', and 'translation of camera, lighting, action, VFX, audio, and production terms' — giving comprehensive coverage of the skill's capabilities.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('prompt wording, cinematic vocabulary, translation of ... terms into Russian') and when ('when the user asks for Russian Seedance 2.0 prompt wording, Russian cinematic vocabulary, or translation ...').	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural phrases like 'Russian Seedance 2.0 prompt wording', 'Russian cinematic vocabulary', and 'translation of ... terms into Russian' are what a user would say, with good domain coverage; falls short of 5 only because the trigger set is somewhat anchored to product jargon ('Seedance 2.0') rather than broad synonym/extension coverage.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	A clear niche (Russian + Seedance 2.0 + cinematic/production vocabulary) with distinct triggers makes overlap with unrelated skills minimal.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

81%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 4 suspicious	Warning

	Total	13 / 16 Passed

Repository: Emily2040/seedance-2.0
Path: skills/seedance-vocab-ru/SKILL.md
Commit: 44b5149

Reviewed: 24 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.