CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

better-auth-security-best-practices

Better Auth security hardening: rate limits, secrets, CSRF, trusted origins, cookies, sessions, OAuth tokens, and audit logging. Use when reviewing auth security, brute-force protection, token handling, or deployment safety.

69

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Reference Repositories

  • Better Auth — TypeScript authentication framework with plugins

Upstream Grounding

When Better Auth rate limiting, CSRF and origin checks, cookie settings, secret handling, token encryption, audit behavior, or deployment security defaults affect correctness, ask DeepWiki a narrow question against better-auth/better-auth before relying on memory. Use it to orient, then verify decisive details against local installed types, source, or official docs before changing code.

Read references/configuration.md when configuring or auditing an option: secrets, rate limiting, CSRF, trusted-origin syntax, sessions, cookies, OAuth token encryption, IP resolution, audit hooks, and a full worked configuration. Those are upstream defaults that move between versions, so confirm decisive ones against installed types before relying on them.

The two sections below are not upstream defaults. They are decisions this repository made, and getting either wrong is an account-takeover or open-redirect surface rather than a misconfiguration.

Do Not Trust Localhost In Production

trustedOrigins gates redirect/callback URLs, not only cookie CSRF, so a permanent localhost entry in a production list widens the open-redirect surface (and Better Auth's docs warn against it). Derive the dev-vs-prod fork from the deployment's own origin (its baked baseURL / resolved env origin), never from the request, and reuse the same fork as the cookie config:

// localhost dev origins are trusted ONLY on a local deployment.
function buildTrustedOrigins(baseURL: string): string[] {
  const prod = [...productionOrigins];
  return isLocalDeployment(baseURL) ? [...prod, ...devOrigins] : prod;
}

Account Linking and Provider Trust

Implicit account linking is an account-takeover surface. When a social sign-in matches an existing user by email, the link gate is (better-auth 1.5.6 oauth2/link-account):

block linking if: (!isTrustedProvider && !userInfo.emailVerified)
                  || accountLinking.enabled === false
                  || accountLinking.disableImplicitLinking === true

A provider in account.accountLinking.trustedProviders bypasses the incoming emailVerified check. So the rule is:

  • trustedProviders may contain ONLY identity providers that always assert a verified email. Google does. GitHub does NOT (it can return an unverified primary email), so never add github to trustedProviders; an untrusted GitHub identity still links when GitHub reports the email verified, which is the safe behavior.
  • Never list email-password in trustedProviders, and do not enable emailAndPassword without emailVerification.sendVerificationEmail + requireEmailVerification. On better-auth versions before the unconditional requireLocalEmailVerified gate (e.g. 1.5.6 has no such option), an attacker can pre-register an unverified local account at a victim's email and have the victim's later trusted-provider sign-in link into it.
  • If you have no email sender, prefer social-IdP-only sign-in over local credentials. That is what closes the takeover at the root.
Repository
EpicenterHQ/epicenter
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.